We can confirm that the crochet sweater was produced at a location that is in accordance with our high ethical standards and in accordance with wage requirements.I have studied this subject, after having strange dreams years ago, coinciding with the great solar flare shortly before the Chiapas earthquake. “At Target, we place high priority on requiring that everything we source is produced ethically and in accordance with all applicable laws, international standards and our policies, including holding ourselves and our partners to a high standard of respect for human rights. After publication, Target spokesperson Courtney Foster emailed a statement: Observer reached out to Target for comment, asking what laborers were paid in the production of these cardigans, where they were sourced from, and if they sold them at a profit loss. Target has a previously stated public policy with regards to their supply chain, which can be read in full here. Both hoped that people would look beyond this sweater and think about how the fast-fashion industry produces all its items, even if they’re not handmade. When asked, Martinez said if she had made a sweater like this herself, she’d set the price for $200. Unless a company has full control over their supply chain, there is almost definitely some unethical labor down the line.” “Even companies that produce in the US could be sourcing fabric and threads made from sweat-shop labor somewhere down the line,” she said. I think people don’t think about this but machines and factories are not just ‘push a button’ automatic.” When asked if these sort of industrial looms are ubiquitous across all fast fashion brands, Dean said yes. “Just setting up knitting machines is extremely labor intensive and takes a lot of skill. “Industrial looms or knitting machines still have to be threaded and set up by hand,” she said. Fast fashion has a bigger cost.ĭean also noted that there’s a human element in all textile production. “This is speculative for the case of this sweater, but I’ve seen it you for letting me use the data you figured out. “Companies will supply materials and find contract workers that will do this at home and pay them 5 cents a piece,” she said. That would likely create better working conditions, but Dean was swift to point out that the per-piece method can be a way for factories to get out of paying an hourly wage. Rhianna Dean, a textile engineer, suggested that the squares may have been commissioned on a piece-per basis, with workers getting paid per the amount they were able to complete. There are more than 20 squares on a single cardigan-meaning more than 10 hours of hand work. I’d assume someone would be making the centers in one color and passing them to the next person with the next color, and so on.” When asked how long it would take her to make a single granny square herself, Martinez guessed around 30 minutes. The pieces do appear to be crocheted from what I can see, and the looping technique is too hard for a machine to replicate. When consulted on the item, Yvonne Martinez, a textile artist, said “You don’t see more mass produced crocheted garments. Initially, there was debate on if the item was manufactured by human or machine, but in the Q&A section for the item, Target staff support confirmed it was made by hand. #target #DIYwithBlock #DuetDoWet #28DaysOfEucerin #crochet #knitting #fyp original sound – Matt Rose #greenscreen Also that 25min? Ive been crocheting for almost 5 years now.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |